ESG rating
We decided to publish three indicators in our fund reports in order to enable our client to measure the integration of ESG criteria into the funds and to increase our level of transparency regarding our responsible investment strategy. These ESG metrics are updated monthly. They are used for information purposes only. The funds do not have regulatory or contractual ESG objectives.
The absolute ESG rating
The absolute ESG rating is based on an assessment method specific to AXA IM (ESG score from 0 to 10). The AXA IM proprietary ESG scoring methodology is developed and maintained by our internal Responsible Investment Team.
The rationale for a non-linear scale for the tree and ‘gas gauge’ object is that the ESG data is not linearly distributed – companies (and portfolios) will cluster around the central tendency. It’s harder to improve the portfolio at the centre of the distribution so a score that is more than 0.5 different from the central value of 5 should be recognised.
In top of that, it enables to have more dispersion through ratings 2,3,4 leaves and avoid concentration on 3. Finally it may be more incentive for PM to improve its selection in order to get the upper tree.
The relative ESG rating
The relative ESG rating is the difference between the fund's absolute ESG rating and the absolute ESG rating of its benchmark or performance indicator. If the fund does not have a benchmark or performance indicator, the relative ESG rating will not be calculated1.
Interpretation:
- If the relative ESG rating is mentioned in green, it means that the absolute ESG score of the fund is between 3% and 15% or > 15% compared to the performance indicator;
- If the relative ESG rating is mentioned in yellow, it means that the absolute ESG score of the fund is between -3% and 3% compared to the performance indicator;
- If the relative ESG rating is indicated in orange, it means that the absolute ESG score of the fund is between -3% and -15% or < -15% compared to the performance indicator.
Similar above, the rationale for an non linear scale for the ESG Relative rating is that a 3% difference in score is (statistically) significant, especially in the centre of the distribution where most portfolios tend to ‘live’.
The relative CO2 intensity
The relative CO2 intensity refers to the carbon footprint of the fund and corresponds to the difference between the CO2 intensity of the fund (expressed in tonnes of CO2/million € of revenue) and the one of the benchmark or performance indicator. If the fund does not have a benchmark or performance indicator, the relative CO2 intensity will not be calculated2.
Interpretation:
- If the relative CO2 intensity is green, it means that the CO2 intensity of the fund is between 10% and 40% or more than 40% lower than the CO2 intensity of the performance indicator;
- If the relative CO2 intensity is yellow, it means that the CO2 intensity of the fund is between -10% and 10% of the CO2 intensity of the performance indicator;
- If the relative CO2 intensity is orange, it means that the CO2 intensity of the fund is between 10% and 40% or more than 40% higher than the CO2 intensity of the performance indicator.
1 Most of funds have a performance indicator used as a comparison only for management purposes. If a fund does not have a performance indicator, the relative ESG rating will not be calculated or displayed.
2 Most funds have a performance indicator used as a comparison only for management purposes. If a fund does not have a performance indicator, the relative CO2 intensity will not be calculated or displayed.
Disclaimer